“A FAILURE OF GOVERNANCE”?

One of the last and most forceful speakers at Monday night’s school board meeting reminded the Board that “it’s all about the money”; made the accusation that “you just don’t get it” (meaning the Board and the significance of the money issue); and pronounced that the handling of the Rhonda Cohen position and promotion was “a failure of governance.”

Do you agree or disagree with the speaker?  Do you feel that the school board deeply understood the community’s message?

Another called for a Web site where the discussion on the topic could continue.  Let’s do that here.  Please use the light green ADD COMMENT link below to add your further messages to the Board.

–Posted by Karen Cure

Hasting Resident Tony Wan Responds to Eric Sweeting’s Letter

The following is parent and resident Tony Wan’s reply to Eric Sweeting’s 6/20 letter about the petition to rescind the appointment of the Assistant Superintendent.
Read Eric’s original letter below. Read the petition, view 458 signatories, and read the comments.

Mr. Eric Sweeting
Board of Education
Hastings on Hudson, NY 10706

Eric,

This letter pertains to your email response to Jodi Hirschman’s petition of the assignment of Dr Rhonda Cohen as Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Personnel submitted on June 18, 2009.

Your response to the petition detailed a list of five items that reduced the cost of the school budget and changes that where deemed necessary by the BOE as alternatives.  The five items are a positive improvement of a stream lined administration, which by the way reduced the larger amount of tax increase on the community.  But as a fact, the five items you listed are part of a continued increase of taxes and a burden which we as a community must put a leash on.

The point I am making is that we as a community have had a school tax increase every year.  No matter the changes made by you and or the BOE, taxes continue to rise.  According to the school budget enrollment has decreased but operating cost have increased.  The school has an average per capita of $23,000+ per student, which does provide a sound education, but has finally boiled over and the burden on families needs to come to end.  In over spent economic times and job losses reaching millions, the schools in Hastings need to learn how to work with what they have, not what they deem is necessary.

In 2007 Dr Shaps and the BOE created the “deemed necessary position”, Director of Curriculum, which is now a salary burdening the tax payers a $140,000+ annually, with benefits. In NYC my wife, who is an Assistant Principal at an elementary school, is one of the hundred’s AP”S who work with the Principals developing its schools curriculum every school year. Granted the student per capita is only an average of $9,000 per student in NYC and the education is not as sound as in Hastings but at a staggering $14,000 difference?  And now the BOE and Dr. Shaps would like to promote Dr Cohen to Asst Superintendent, increase the salary by $18,000+ and add a new tax payer burden, “tenure”, after 2 ½ years of employment in our district, now this is obscene.

I am a self employed owner of a company in the construction field in NYC.  My company prides itself on reducing the cost of a construction project by thousands of dollars. These savings are immediately passed on to the client and a fiscally responsible construction budget is created for all involved and agreed upon.  If I were to reduce the cost and tell the client that they can go purchase the most expensive “toilet”, I would be flushing a part of my companies profits down that “toilet”, because I’ve reduced my cost and enabled the client to spend a percentage of my profits I’ve given back.  My comparison is that of your five items, save here, spend it there.  How about just save for a rainy day, the future budget and or no tax raise.

Lastly, as a concerned home owner and parent of two children who will be attending the Farragut Middle School this September, I urge you to listen.  There are families in Hastings who pay a whopping $20,000 a year in taxes and do not even have children of school age any more.  I will not and can not see myself in 8 years paying a 1/3rd increase in taxes which have already increased 100% to $16,000 a year since we moved to Hastings in 2003 and worry about college tuition and my own retirement.

Regards,

Tony Wan, Hastings on Hudson Resident

Posted by Jane Cody

School Board’s Response to Issues Raised in Petition

Second Letter from the School Board (6/29), reproduced below.
The Hastings Alliance for Affordable Taxes doesn’t endorse the thinking set forth in the School Board’s letter. This letter is published because we want to give community members all relevant information, even when we don’t agree with the perspective. (I removed the cell phone numbers of Board members because I don’t want to distribute them on the web.)

Dear Hastings Community Member,

As we stated in our earlier email from this afternoon, we want to give the community information on why we support the promotion from Director to Assistant Superintendent. We have organized this information to address the four basic categories of questions that appeared in the petition’s comments: Why make this change now? Why wasn’t a search conducted? How can our District afford this? Why the short tenure track?

1. Why make this change now?
We had to make a number of very important management decisions in the past few weeks and this promotion was made in the context of those decisions. We now have a new administrative team that includes two new principals and two new assistant principals (one still to be hired). We have assembled a strong team and recognize that they will need help in aspects of their new roles where they have less experience. We now have the opportunity to move the District forward in tackling the curriculum and instruction issues that cut across grades and buildings. By elevating the curriculum position to the Assistant Superintendent level as the new team begins its work, we can ensure that these issues are not neglected, that the solutions reflect the need for continuity across the grades K-12, and that the administrators will have a strong mentor and coach to lead them in these efforts.

Raising this position to the Assistant Superintendent level does not mean that we will also have to hire a new Director. This position will cover the duties of the Director position as well – working with teachers on curriculum and instruction. Also, the Assistant Superintendent is not automatically next in line for the Superintendent’s position.

2. Why wasn’t a search conducted?
The primary reason we did not conduct a search was that we were not looking for a new outside candidate. We’ve had two years to observe Dr. Cohen in the Director of Curriculum role and feel she is very well qualified for this expanded position. She has moved the District forward on major curriculum changes that had previously seemed impossible and worked with all the teachers involved to include them in the decision-making and implementation process. The Assistant Superintendent role calls upon these same skills and experience, but also includes the responsibility of mentoring and training the four new administrators as well as working with all the administrators to drive improvements in curriculum and instruction K-12. This does not mean that this position will have hiring, firing, or disciplinary authority over the principals. That authority, along with their formal evaluation, will remain with the Superintendent.

Some examples of her work: At Hillside Dr. Cohen has succeeded in creating curriculum review processes that involve and engage all the teachers, general and special education, as well as the aides and other support staff. She has designed and led grade-specific training programs and a multi-year training model. Due to her efforts and leadership and the hard work of the grade teams she’s worked with, Hillside had a virtually seamless transition from a weak math program (Trailblazers) to Everyday Math, a program that the Hillside teachers feel meets their needs as it challenges and supports students.

While Dr. Cohen has spent much of her initial two years working on major efforts at Hillside, she has also been guiding the teachers and staff K-12 in making sound and economical curriculum decisions, including revamping the K-8 literacy programs, and redesigning our K-12 professional development days so they are more focused on crucial department-specific work.

3. How can the District afford this?
We realize in this time of economic hardship that any increase in expenditure must be subject to scrutiny. Over the past three years we have decreased administrative personnel costs in the support areas (finance, technology, facilities, and food service), so that we can focus our resources on curriculum and instruction. For example, by replacing our Assistant Superintendent for Finance with a District Treasurer we saved over $50,000/year. Even with expected salary changes, the total administrator salary budget will be lower next year than this year. Just as we looked at how to apply the $600K in restored NY State aid to the budget and decided to apply $139K to program and the other $461K to tax savings, we feel it is important now to apply some of the administrator cost savings from this year to ensuring we have strong curriculum and instruction leadership.

We feel this expenditure is offset by Dr. Cohen’s track record of ensuring quality and cost management in the areas of curriculum implementation, professional development, and vendor relations. In the past, committees of teachers and administrators worked over several years with consultants on how to write curriculum documents. In our Strategic Planning discussions we learned that both faculty and administrators had major issues with this process. There was no support for implementation, little department-specific professional development to improve instruction, and very little cost management. Dr. Cohen’s work over the past two years has given the District a collaborative model for analyzing curriculum, smooth implementations of large multi-grade projects, and fine-tuned professional development. On top of that, she has saved the District thousands of dollars by managing the costs of all these efforts. For example, in the Everyday Math implementation, she negotiated for free math materials and 30% discounts on teacher kits, pre-screened Everyday Math instructors to select the best and then obtained five free days of professional development, and secured the exchange of $7K in Trailblazer math materials for elementary science equipment.

4. Why the short tenure track?
State law requires that for a district of our size, all administrative and supervisory positions, other than the superintendent, must be eligible for tenure. In addition, the law states that when the responsibilities of the current position constitute a majority of those under a different title the person changing from one position to the other continues in their existing tenure track.

In this letter, we have tried to be open and answer the questions raised about this promotion. As we mentioned in our previous email we will be meeting on Monday, June 29th, at 8 p.m. in the Farragut Complex Cafeteria to review all the points made and discuss your concerns and questions. For those who cannot join us and have specific questions you want the Board to respond to at the meeting, please forward them to either Gabrielle Lesser or Eileen Baecher so that we can include them in our public discussion (see contact info below).

For the coming year we are also considering changes to our meeting structure that would allow for question and answer time rather than just a hearing period.  We welcome any thoughts on how that might be structured, as well as any other ideas people have for improving the functioning of the Board. Please remember that though we may be Board members we are also members of the community and share its challenges and concerns. We work hard and put in the time to understand the issues facing the District. While some may disagree with individual decisions, we hope that our work is judged in the total context of what we are doing to improve cost effectiveness while improving the quality of education.

Thank you,

Hastings-on-Hudson Board of Education

Eric Sweeting, President
Gabrielle Lesser, Vice President – gablesser@mac.com
Eileen Baecher – ebboard@verizon.net
Caryn Campbell
Lindsey Hicks
Donna Laing
Jodie Meyer

Posted by Jane Cody

School Board Announces Public Forum Monday (6/29) @ 8:00 PM in HS Cafeteria

First Letter from the School Board (6/29), reproduced below.
The Hastings Alliance for Affordable Taxes doesn’t endorse the thinking set forth in the School Board’s letter. This letter is published because we want to give community members all relevant information, even when we don’t agree with the perspective.

HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON U F S D
Message sent – 6/26/2009
School Board Meeting – Monday, June 29th at 8pm
Dear Hastings Community Members,

A week ago the School Board ignited a controversy when we announced
the promotion of our Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Personnel
(CIP) to Assistant Superintendent. Our intent was to strengthen the
administrative team, which will have four new members this coming
year, and enable them to lead the District forward. Instead we angered
many residents and confused others. We have read the petition signed
by many, many residents demanding a reconsideration of the decision.
We have also received numerous calls and emails both for and against
the decision. While we have issued some early responses, we need to
take the time now to acknowledge what went wrong and what needs to be
done to move forward.

As a Board, we think the CIP position has strong merits and answers a
real need, which was identified in the community’s development of the
Strategic Plan. However, our understanding of the position’s benefits
and the process we used to make the promotion decision needed to be
much more open so that residents could share their opinions. Through
our work on the budget this year with the community and the Citizens
Budget Advisory Committee, we had achieved an unprecedented level of
transparency for this District. However, through our lack of
interaction with the community on this promotion, we have seriously
damaged the trust we built during the budget process. We must now work
to rebuild the community’s trust in us and ask you to join us in that
effort.

We are especially sorry and concerned that this decision came across
as insensitive to the economic hardship the community is facing. In
our deliberations, we looked long and hard at the budget impact of
this move and consciously scaled back on other administrative costs to
make sure the overall administrative budget would stay flat. However,
we understand that any decision to grant a raise and not pass on a
savings to the community should be clearly explained.

In order to give all community members a chance to discuss these
issues and share their opinions, we are scheduling a Board meeting for
Monday, June 29 at 8 p.m. in the Farragut Complex Cafeteria.

We apologize for the tight timeframe but hope you will join us if you
are available. The meeting will be videotaped and available later for
viewing online and on Channel 77.

Later today we will be sending out another broadcast email with more
detailed information on our reasoning for this promotion. At the
meeting on Monday, we will review all the points made and discuss your
concerns and questions. For those who cannot join us and have specific
questions you want the Board to respond to at the meeting, please
forward them via email or phone to either Gabrielle Lesser or Eileen
Baecher so that we can include them in our public discussion (see
contact info below).

Thank you,

Hastings-on-Hudson Board of Education

Eric Sweeting, President
Gabrielle Lesser, Vice President – gablesser@mac.com – cell: 914-318-0783
Eileen Baecher – ebboard@verizon.net – cell: 914-275-7318
Caryn Campbell
Lindsey Hicks
Donna Laing
Jodie Meyer

Posted by Jane Cody

Board of Education President Eric Sweeting’s Reply to the Petition

I thought it would be helpful to publish both the original email that launched the petition, along with Eric Sweeting’s response. It is not clear if he is speaking on behalf of the entire School Board. Both emails are in widespread circulation.

–Jane Cody

Sent: Sat, Jun 20, 2009 4:58 pm

Dear Jodi Hirschman:

X

I know you have not written to me directly but many people have forwarded your petition email on to me with questions so I hope it is okay that I am writing to you.    I’d like to take a few minutes to clarify some things and give some perspective and context to Dr. Cohen’s appointment.  In the decade that I have been following Board and district politics and for the six years I have been on the Board, the following administrative changes have been made:

X

1. Dr. Sharon Burkibyle was appointed to the position of Assistant Superintendent.  She was then promoted to Deputy Superintendent.   When she left these positions were eliminated.

X

2. John Chow was promoted to Assistant Superintendent of Finance.   When he left Dr. Shaps replaced this position with that of a Treasurer–for considerable cost savings.

x

3. Last year we eliminated the position of Director of Technology and reassigned the tasks involved to two existing positions and created the position of Data Manager.

X

4. This past year we eliminated the postion of Food Service Director as a district employee and included this position in the RFP’s for the food program which also resulted in savings.

X

5. This summer the current Assistant Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds will be retiring and will be replaced by someone in the position of Head of Facilities–also for considerable cost savings.

X

I list these administrative changes for a number of reasons.   One, each of them were made with the best of intentions by various Boards and Superintendents in response to very specific situations confronting the district at the time.   Secondly, none of them involved public comment or input.   In each example the change to the organizational chart of the district was made by the Board and the Superintendent in response to specific needs and specific financial considerations.  I think the Board and the Superintendent have the responsibility to make changes to the organizational structure of the district based on current needs.  At the moment we are facing a school year with four of the six building administrators being brand new to the position.    And you will note that they support this decision, with one of them stating publicly they had little experience with curriculum design or implementation.  You may not think that these positions listed above are equal in scope or magnitude to the Dr. Cohen’s (although two refer to second highest ranking positions) but they are certainly as big or in some cases much bigger in terms of financial impact.  Secondly, you will see that the one thing all these positions have in common is that they do not have direct contact with students or parents and this is true of Dr. Cohen’s position as well.   Her position is focused on faculty and staff development.    Hastings has always employeed an extensive process for soliciting community input into decisions regarding positions with student and parent contact–such as Principals and Assistant Principals.  And certainly we will continue to do so.  You yourself say that the search for High School Principal was an exhaustive, inclusive and open process.  Positions that relate to the internal organization of the district can and should be made by the people closest to the issues and intimately aware of the needs and weaknesses.   This is why we hire competent and experienced Superintendents–so they can assemble their team and support the needs of the district.

X

The Superintendent is (and should be) judged on the basis of the overall success of the district.  I think it is unfair to ask him to run a 43 million dollar operation  and then tell him that he cannot put key players into strategic positions and align the organizational structure of the district in a way that responds to his understanding of the needs of the district.

X

Please be very careful about what message you want to send to the Superintendent and any future person in that position if that is how you regard his role.

X

In your email you ask if Dr. Cohen has the expertise and experience for this position.   The answer is yes.   She, in fact,  has the legal and professsional qualifications to be a Superintendent.   You also question why she will be given disciplinary authority over Principals.   This is an overstatement of the role.   Dr. Cohen will not be hiring or firing Principals.  This authority, along with their formal evaluation, will remain with the Superintendent where it belongs.   Please also remember that the original idea for this position came from dissatisfaction in the community voiced during the drafting of the Strategic Plan.   The creation of this position came from the recommendations in that document.  And when Dr. Cohen was hired there was an interview committee composed of representatives from various constituency groups (despite being a position without direct student or parent contact!), a review of credientials and writing samples and interviews with the Board and with administrators.   Dr. Cohen has performed beautfully in this role and given the need for more curriculum development (change in NYS math structure, questions about continuing Elementary Spanish and what that does to World Language Dept at MS and HS, consideration to expanding block schedules to middle school, brand new Principals and AP’s, etc.) we feel it is important to enhance this position at this time.   You may or may not be aware of her work to create grade level teams of teachers at Hillside who all have common “prep periods” so unified curriculum work can be done.   Or her extensive work with all of the 6-12 Department Chairs to eliminate gaps in topics and content.   Or the unification of K-5 curriculum with the expectation of individual High School Departments.    Or the support for Hillside teachers as they master the new math curriculum.    If not, I encourage you to find out more about all of these things.    The point is that these things happen with teachers, not parents.   Hence the big difference in the process of appointment.

X

You also question the cost of this position given the economic stress and the bugetary difficulties this year.    I know many people roll their eyes when I try to explain that our administrative costs as a percentage of the budget have dropped every year for the three years Dr. Shaps has been here.   They are also down by actual dollar amounts, due to some of the organizational changes mentioned in the first paragraph above and also due to the four new administrators all coming in a lower salaries than their senior level predecessors.   With Dr. Cohen’s increase starting on July 1st she will make $50 more than the current Middle School Principal (who does not have the doctoral degree or the national research and publication record).    If that administrator gets even a 1% increase she will be back above Dr. Cohen by the time Dr. Cohen starts the new position.     Please also acknowledge that Dr. Cohen has saved the district tens of thousands of dollars in previsouly budgeted curriculum consultants (Social Studies Dept, Science Dept, World Lang) and arranged for free staff development and library materials from textbook vendors, things we had never tapped into before.  We have made a determined effort to promote members of the staff and faculty into senior positions in the district (ie: Lou Adepietro, Brent Harrington, Laura Sullivan) because it makes sense for many reasons–financial, builds community, supports professional growth, models continuous improvement, etc.   And we want these people to stay for a long time.   It costs a lot of money to replace administrators (the advertisement cost alone is $10,000) so appropriately supporting our new adminstrators (developing professional growth plans, providing resources, expertise and broad knowledge of K-12 curriculum) is vital and strategic.

X

I don’t know if the agenda is to drive this person away but I wouldn’t be at all surprised if this were successful.   Who would want to work 12 hour days and have their role questioned so publicly on the front page of the local paper and public petitions?    I do know this: if she leaves we will be left with nobody in this critical position at a time when we need it desperately and it is inevitable that the replacement person, even if hired at the level of Director, will be hired at a salary higher than the $160,000 identified.    Please see salary for Dobbs Ferry’s Director of Curriculum (no doctoate) which is higher than $160,000.    Please also see salary organizational charts and salary structures for Briarcliff, Pleasantville, Bronxville, Ardsley and Irvington.

X

Finally,  I’m sure you are aware that we have a reputation as a difficult district in which to work and for being a community resistant to change.   Along with other national and local reasons these things limit our applicant pool for senior level administrators.   If we were also to become known as the district that rescinded appointments (not under consideration) we would be in serious trouble.  If this were the case, in the future, when you are on the School Board, you will have much bigger problems on your hands.    There is no conspiracy here to trick the community.   We could have done the easy thing and made this appointment at the next meeting in July.   The Board chose not to do that so that people would be informed of the positive changes happening in the district.   The Board is composed of well intentioned people trying to do the right thing given lots of competing interests.  I guess no good deed goes unpunished.

X

I hope you will go this week to speak to Dr. Cohen and hear from her about the work she has been doing and the ideas she has for our school district.  I will forward your petition and this response to her so she knows the extent of our conversation.   After that I look forward to continuing our discussion about this important topic.  Please share my thoughts with people on your circ list.  I only ask that if you do so you do so in its entirety.

X

All Best,

X

Eric Sweeting

X

Please share your thoughts by commenting below.

X

Original Petition Letter

I thought it would be helpful to publish both the original email that launched the petition, along with Eric Sweeting’s response. Although  both emails are in widespread circulation, not everyone may have seen them. (I did remove the personal email addresses.) Please share your thoughts by commenting below.

–Posted by Jane Cody

—–Original Message—–
Sent: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 11:35 pm
Subject: PLEASE FOWARD: Petition to Rescind Assistant Superintendent Appointment

On line petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/hastings-board-of-ed-to-suspend-assistant-superintendent-appointment

At 12:24 PM on Monday June 15, 2009 the Hastings Superintendent of Schools and the Hastings Board of Education announced their intent to promote Dr. Rhonda Cohen to the newly created position of Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum, Instruction and Personnel.  At the Board meeting that same evening, the Board voted to appoint Ms. Cohen to the position, effective July 1, 2009. Given the inadequacy of the notice provided and the fact that Board voted to approve Dr. Cohen’s appointment prior to any public comment, there was no opportunity for meaningful public input into the determination.
The position to which Dr. Cohen was just appointed appears to be the second highest ranking position within the school district, giving her authority over Principals, Assistant Principals and teachers. It is a position that did not exist prior to June 15, 2009. In her current position as Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Personnel. Dr. Cohen’s salary is $141,878 (see adopted 2009-2010 budget, p. 26). In her new appointment as Assistant Superintendent, Ms. Cohen’s salary will be $160,000. She will be eligible for tenure as the Assistant Superintendent in March 2010- a mere 6 months after she commences the posit ion following the beginning of the 2009-2010 school year.

The manner in which this appointment was made raises a host of questions and concerns. Why was the first and only notice about the appointment sent in the middle of the day on the same day of the meeting? Why was the appointment made at the last board meeting of the school year, just prior to the 2 month summer break? Why was the opportunity for public commentary afforded only after the board made the appointment? Why was the manner of appointment to this newly created, high level administrative position handled by the board differently than the manner in which the board determined the appointment of Mr. Adipietro to the existing vacant position for the High School Principal? The appointment of Mr. Adipietro was made after an exhaustive, inclusive and open process. His appointment reflects the collective wisdom and experience of school personnel, the Board of Education and the Hastings community. In contrast, the appointment of Dr. Cohen to a newly created position, with an $18,122 pay raise and tenure eligibility after only 6 months on the job, wherein she will have the greatest authority in the school district other than the Superintendent, was done without notice and without the opportunity for any public commentary prior to the determination.

During the 2009- 2010 budget process this community was very vocal about the financial burden from ever increasing taxes. To address competing ne eds, multiple important positions and services (such as such as bus monitors, swim team, social workers, and others) were cut and/or reduced while Dr. Cohen’s salary as Director of Curriculum was increased to $141,878.20. This salary increase was the subject of publicly expressed community discontent. How can the Board now justify a rubber stamp salary increase of almost $20,000 less than two months after the budget process ended?

Furthermore, if one of the roles of the new Assistant Superintendent is to oversee all school personnel, what qualifications and experience does Dr. Cohen have to train, supervise, mentor, and/or discipline Principals, Vice Principals and teachers.

< a name=”lw_1245373435_0″>
Given the significant level of authority the position will hold, including disciplinary and supervisory authority over teachers and principals, the high level of pay, the short period of probation and the long-standing, permanent fiscal and educational implications once tenure is achieved, any appointment to the position of Assistant Superintendent requires transparency and an opportunity for public input and scrutiny. Anything less makes the appointment suspect.

I therefore urge all Hastings residents to

request that the Board Of Education immediately rescind  the a ppointment of Dr. Cohen to the position of Assistant Superintendent, which is scheduled to take effect July 1, 2009.  In addition the Board should provide:
(1) the opportunity for meaningful public debate about whether there is a need for this position and, if the position is deemed necessary,
(2) an open public hiring  process to determine the most qualified person for the position.

A petition with such request will be submitted to the Board on June 24th, 2009. To sign the on-line petition please go to http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/hastings-board-of-ed-to-suspend-assistant-superintendent-appointment

If you prefer to sign a hard copy please email me  to make arrangements.

Jodi Hirschman, Hastings-on-Hudson resident

Word Cloud from 341 Petition Comments

From the Petition

341 Petition Signatories, and Growing

In just three days, 341 people have signed the petition calling on the Superintendent and Board of Education to rescind the appointment of the Asst. Superintendent. More people sign every every day, and many people leave comments.  I encourage everyone to read these comments, which provide insight into people’s thinking and reveal concerns about process, this administrative role, and expenditures and taxes.  (Click here to see the petition site.) This is an opportunity for the Superintendent and School Board to demonstrate  responsiveness and work towards consensus.

Posted by Jane Cody

Opinions posted reflect viewpoint of the poster.

Journal News Story

Click here to view yesterday’s Journal News article about the petition.

To join the mailing list for this blog,  send an email to hastingstaxes@gmail.com with SUBSCRIBE followed by YOUR FULL NAME in the subject line; to get involved send an email to that same address with GET INVOLVED in the subject line.

And, please add your comments below. We want to know what you think.

Posted by Jane Cody

Petition Circulating to Rescind Appointment of Assistant Superintendent

Check it out:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/hastings-board-of-ed-to-suspend-assistant-superintendent-appointment

Additional  clarification: it should be noted that there has been a Director of Curriculum position for 2 years, which was included in the recently passed budget. This position is a tenure track position, with a  salary allocated in the recent budget was $141 k.

The Asst. Supt. position replaces the Dir. of Curriculum position.

The  Asst. Supt. position involves greater authority and $160 k salary, and a transfer of the time already accrued towards tenure (in the Director position) towards the Asst. Supt. position. (There are state laws that govern this; I am not familiar with them.) On Wednesday I requested job descriptions for the Director and the Asst. Supt.positions, as well as a copy of the organization charts and reporting structure before and after the appointment.  I’ll publish them when I receive them from the school administration.

I glad to see that the discussion is focused on the public approval process and the priorities of our school system, as opposed to the  individual in Dir. of Curriculum position. I want to reiterate that this discussion has nothing to do with her qualifications or capabilities, but rather the process and the priorities of our school district.

Posted by Jane Cody
Postings reflect opinion of poster