Posts tagged ‘curriculum’
Petition Circulating to Rescind Appointment of Assistant Superintendent
Check it out:
Additional clarification: it should be noted that there has been a Director of Curriculum position for 2 years, which was included in the recently passed budget. This position is a tenure track position, with a salary allocated in the recent budget was $141 k.
The Asst. Supt. position replaces the Dir. of Curriculum position.
The Asst. Supt. position involves greater authority and $160 k salary, and a transfer of the time already accrued towards tenure (in the Director position) towards the Asst. Supt. position. (There are state laws that govern this; I am not familiar with them.) On Wednesday I requested job descriptions for the Director and the Asst. Supt.positions, as well as a copy of the organization charts and reporting structure before and after the appointment. I’ll publish them when I receive them from the school administration.
I glad to see that the discussion is focused on the public approval process and the priorities of our school system, as opposed to the individual in Dir. of Curriculum position. I want to reiterate that this discussion has nothing to do with her qualifications or capabilities, but rather the process and the priorities of our school district.
Posted by Jane Cody
Postings reflect opinion of poster
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
Asst. Superintendent position announced, approved
and staffed in a single day
Yesterday, at 12:24 pm, the Superintendent and the Hastings Board of Education announced the creation of a position called the “Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum, Instruction & Personnel”. That same day, during the last School Board meeting of this academic year, the Board voted to hire Rhonda Cohen for this position.
This is an egregious violation of the public trust.
This is not about the merits or demerits of Rhonda Cohen. It is about the absence of an opportunity for the public to debate the need for such a position, to consider the merits of the candidate, to know whether there had been an open hiring process that solicited additional candidates, or to assess whether we can afford such a position. There was no information provided about the salary or terms of the position, whether it is subject to tenured position, and, if so, when.
Only after the Board had approved the position did the public have an opportunity to comment. Not surprisingly there weren’t many comments because few people even knew about the appointment because it had been announced only seven hours prior to the meeting. However three Hastings residents voiced their strong concerns about the lack of an open process. One resident asked the Board to rescind the appointment, based on the absence of an open process.
Despite our current state of austerity, the Superintendent and the Board did not solicit public input for such an important, high ranking, and probably highly paid position. This is a bold and outrageous move to avoid public debate and circumvent the normal vetting process for a public position that the Superintendent and the Board know may be controversial.
Below is the text of yesterday’s email announcing the position.
Speak up! Scroll down to Add Comments. We want to know what the community thinks:
- about the decision making process,
- whether or not there is a need for this position.
- whether the Board should rescind its decision
Posted by Jane Cody
From: Outreach Message Hastings-on-Hudson <hayesd@hastings.k12.ny.us>
Sent: Mon, Jun 15, 2009 12:23 pm
Subject: Board of Ed. to consider 3 admin. appointments
![]() |
|||||||
|


Most recent comments